In the long run, history will validate the trend of Donald Trump on a boundary wall to protect the sovereignty and security of the United States.
Why? Because global climate change, not climate change, is the real existential crisis of the West.
The American people know this, and even the elite understand it.
think not? Well, check out the major liberal newspapers on Thursday.
The Washington Post and The New York Times gave two-page stories about the Presidential battle with Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer on financing each of the boundary wall.
Inside the first section, there were more stories in the post, including the wall in history, from the Great Wall of China to the wall of the Berlin Wall and from the wall of the Israeli West Bank, Hungary is separated from Serbia.
Inside the Times was a new anti-immigration party, a growing story in Volgos, Spain, in Andalusia, and after the refusal to enter Europe, the story of welcoming African migrants in Malta was welcome.
Another Times relates to the story of how the new Brazilian President, Jair Bolsonaro, announced a U.N. The announcement is made out of the packet, "Brazil has the right to decide whether it accepts immigrants or not."
Half columns on paper op-ed pages are dealt with trump, immigration and wall. And the new issues of Democrats, nothing was important in the Green New Deal.
Consider. In 1992, the author's presidential campaign had to fight for the "structures" on the border to be included in the GOP platform.
Now, the entire western world is concerned about its boundaries because there are issues of immigration and identity in almost every country.
Looking forward, does anyone think that in 2030, Americans will be more concerned about North Korea and South Korea, or Turkey and Syria, or Kuwait and Iraq, or the border between Russia and Ukraine, the US boundaries of 2,000 miles Compared to and Mexico?
Does anyone think that the position of Pelosi is a wall unethical and it will not be considered absurd?
The southern border of America is ultimately known as military and rescue or the United States, as we know it is going to close for existence. And the Americans will not be gentle at that good night.
Whatever can think of facing up to "Chuck and Nancy" on Tuesday, the picture of an unstable border crisis of Trump is dead: "In the last two years, ICE officers arrested 266,000 gangs with criminal records In which he was involved, he was convicted for 100,000 attacks, 30,000 sexual offenses and 4,000 violent murders. "
Democrats routine retort, that the crime rate of parent origin Americans is high, as new atrocities will not be enough, such as Trump related, inform and repeat before November 2020.
What should trump do now? Act. He could not defeat this fight with Pelosi without losing his people and losing his presidential position.
Since FDR, our President is the government. And when the US president is a decisive worker, history has rewarded his work.
Lincoln suspended habeas corpus. On assuming charge, the FDR declared bank holiday. When Britain was barely hanging in World War II, it switched 50 vandals for British bases. They ordered American ships to chase German submarines and lied about it Truman fired General MacArthur.
Reagan fired striking airborne controllers and ordered the army to capture Grenada, who halted Marxist thugs who took the coup after making 500 American medical students hostage.
Critics raged: Reagan had no right to attack. But the American people rewarded Reagan with 49-state landslide.
Trump should declare a national emergency, transfer money outside the Pentagon, build its wall, government should open and Democrats should find excuses for not securing our border because their demographic and ideological interest in changing the face of the nation is.
Welfare is needed for a large part of the American population, more social workers are required, and more and more voters will have to vote to pursue a liberal welfare state.
The more multinational, the majority, multicultural, multilingual America becomes – the less it looks like Ronald Reagan's America – the more it will become Democratically Democratic.
The Democratic Party is hostile to white men, because in the shortest possible time, Democrats receive national assets, as small men become white men.
The golden calf of the Democratic Party, the only way to increase "diversity" is to increase the number of women, African-American, Asian and Hispanic people, and thus reduce the number of white men.
The issues which Trump was chosen were not the old Republican lawsuits of tax deductions, conservative judges and increased defense spending.
They were securing the boundaries, removing America from silly wars, the NAFTA nations were removing trade deficits with the European Union and China, the allies paid a fair share of their defense base, our manufacturing base Resurrected and resided with Russia.
"America First!" There is still a winner's hand.